Tier 1 Bowen Ratio
Synthesis
Related diagnostics
Bowen Ratio Change
| Variables | avg_ishf, avg_slhtf |
|---|---|
| Models | ifs-fesom, ifs-nemo |
| Units | W/m2 |
| Baseline | 1990-2014 |
| Future | 2040-2049 |
| Method | B = SHF/LHF. ΔB = B_future − B_historical. |
Summary high
This figure displays the projected change in the Bowen ratio (sensible/latent heat flux) for the mid-21st century (2040–2049, SSP3-7.0) relative to the historical baseline (1990–2014) in the IFS-FESOM and IFS-NEMO coupled models. The maps highlight shifts in surface energy partitioning, serving as a proxy for changes in hydrological regimes and aridity.
Key Findings
- A prominent dipole is visible in North Africa: a strong decrease in Bowen ratio (blue) across the Sahel indicates wetting ('Sahel greening' and northward ITCZ shift), while the Mediterranean and northern Saharan margins show a strong increase (red), signaling drying.
- Southern Africa and the Western United States exhibit a marked increase in Bowen ratio, consistent with regional aridification trends and reduced soil moisture availability.
- Complex, high-magnitude changes occur over the cryosphere (Greenland and Antarctica), where the ratio is sensitive to small changes in sublimation and surface melt regimes.
Spatial Patterns
The most coherent patterns are zonal bands in the tropics/subtropics. The Sahel blue band contrasts sharply with the red drying signals in the subtropics (Mediterranean, Southern Africa, parts of Australia). High-elevation regions like the Himalayas and Andes show distinct decreases in Bowen ratio, likely due to increased snowmelt or precipitation. The Amazon basin shows a moderate increase (drying), more pronounced in the IFS-NEMO simulation.
Model Agreement
There is very high spatial correlation between IFS-FESOM and IFS-NEMO. This is expected as both use the same atmospheric IFS model and land surface scheme (HTESSEL). Minor discrepancies in magnitude (e.g., over the Amazon and interior Australia) likely stem from differences in Sea Surface Temperatures (SSTs) arising from the different ocean models (FESOM vs. NEMO) modulating continental moisture advection.
Physical Interpretation
An increase in Bowen ratio (positive anomalies, red) indicates a shift from latent to sensible heat fluxes, typically driven by soil moisture depletion which limits evapotranspiration (land-atmosphere feedback). Conversely, a decrease (negative anomalies, blue) implies increased moisture availability, allowing more net radiation to be dissipated through evaporation (latent heat), as seen in the intensified West African Monsoon region.
Caveats
- The Bowen ratio becomes mathematically unstable or sensitive to small absolute errors in regions where Latent Heat Flux is near zero (e.g., arid deserts and polar ice sheets), making high-latitude signals difficult to interpret without separate flux components.
- The 10-year future averaging period (2040-2049) is relatively short and may contain unremoved internal decadal variability.
Evaporative Fraction Change
| Variables | avg_ishf, avg_slhtf |
|---|---|
| Models | ifs-fesom, ifs-nemo |
| Units | W/m2 |
| Baseline | 1990-2014 |
| Future | 2040-2049 |
| Method | EF = LHF/(SHF+LHF). ΔEF = EF_future − EF_historical. |
Summary high
The figure displays the projected change in Evaporative Fraction (EF) by the 2040s under SSP3-7.0 relative to the historical baseline for IFS-FESOM and IFS-NEMO, highlighting a robust contrast between drying in the subtropics and wetting in high latitudes.
Key Findings
- Pronounced decreases in EF (browning, <-0.1) over the Amazon, Southern Africa, the Mediterranean, and Western North America indicate a shift towards sensible heat dominance due to soil moisture limitations.
- Strong increases in EF (teal, >0.15) occur over the Arctic Ocean and marginal seas (e.g., Barents, Kara) and the Southern Ocean near Antarctica, directly linked to sea-ice retreat and exposure of open water.
- A distinct band of increased EF is visible across the Sahel and Central Africa, suggesting an intensification or northward shift of the West African Monsoon.
- High-latitude land masses (Siberia, Northern Canada) show widespread EF increases, consistent with enhanced evapotranspiration from warming and permafrost thaw.
Spatial Patterns
The maps reveal a 'wet-get-wetter, dry-get-drier' terrestrial signal: moisture-limited regions (subtropics) show reduced EF, while energy-limited regions (high latitudes) and convective zones (ITCZ) show increased EF. Oceanic patterns are dominated by high-latitude sea-ice edge retreat.
Model Agreement
Agreement is very high between IFS-FESOM and IFS-NEMO, particularly over land. This is expected as they share the same atmospheric component (IFS). Minor discrepancies exist in the Southern Ocean sea-ice zone and North Atlantic subpolar gyre, likely attributable to differences in ocean grid geometry (unstructured FESOM vs. structured NEMO) affecting sea-ice dynamics and SST fronts.
Physical Interpretation
Over land, the pattern reflects the thermodynamic response to warming: in water-limited regions (e.g., Mediterranean), increased evaporative demand depletes soil moisture, shifting energy partitioning to sensible heat (lower EF). In energy-limited high latitudes, warming facilitates greater evapotranspiration (higher EF). Over the oceans, the drastic EF increase at the poles is driven by the loss of insulating sea ice, allowing large latent heat fluxes from the exposed, relatively warm ocean to the cold atmosphere.
Caveats
- The analysis relies on a ratio; changes in EF do not indicate the absolute magnitude of flux changes, only the partitioning.
- The 10-year future window (2040-2049) is relatively short and may be influenced by decadal variability superimposed on the climate change signal.
- Atmospheric dominance over land obscures potential feedback differences from the distinct ocean models.